JAMEEL KHAN RASOOL KHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/563/2026 · 2026-07-27
Shri Sandipkumar C More, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2893 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2893 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
563.2026WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2026 JAMEEL KHAN RASOOL KHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Mudassir H. Shaikh APP for Respondent/State : Mr. N.B. Patil CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 27.07.2026 P.C. : 1] Heard. 2] By this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to decide the petitioner’s application/representation filed before respondent no.3 i.e. the concerned Police Officer of Kranti Chowk Police Station for execution of conviction warrant as per the order of learned JMFC 16th Court, Aurangabad dated
08.02.2016. However, the grievance of the petitioner appears that concerned Police Officer is not executing the conviction warrant as per the aforesaid order. 3] There is a specific procedure given in the BNSS 2023 as to how the fine amount is to be recovered from the accused. Moreover, the grievance raised with respondent no.3 can also be redressed by approaching the concerned Magistrate, who has passed the order of conviction, for making request to issue conviction warrant. 2026:BHC-AUG:31057-DB
563.2026WP 2 4] Under such circumstances, when the petitioner is having alternate remedy, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. 5] In view of the same, the petition stands dismissed.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga