Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28927 (PNJ)

SUNIL SHARDA v. MAHESH BALIYAN

CR/3583/2026 · 2026-07-13

Harsh Bunger

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-3583-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 159 CR-3583-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Sunil Sharda ....Petitioner Vs. Mahesh Baliyan ....Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate with Mr. Khushan Dutta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate with Mr. Harlove Rajput, Advocate for the respondent. ***** HARSH BUNGER J. (Oral) 1 Petition herein, is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking setting aside of conditional warrants of arrest dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-11), pursuant to which, the petitioner has been arrested on 25.04.2026, vide order dated 25.04.2026 (Annexure P-12) passed by learned Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he had approached this Court for setting aside the conditional warrants of arrest issued vide order dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-11), however, since the petitioner has already been released; therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present civil revision petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedies, in accordance with law. ANKIT 2026.07.14 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CR-3583-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. Keeping in view the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 4. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. (HARSH BUNGER) 13.07.2026 JUDGE Ankit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No ANKIT 2026.07.14 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh