Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2892 (KAR)

SRI DEVARAJU K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/10808/2026 · 2026-04-10

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20136 WP No. 10808 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 10808 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DEVARAJU K S/O. LATE SRI. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A NO.16, KEMPATHIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 2. SRI. MANJUNATH K, S/O. LATE SRI. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A NO.16, KEMPATHIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 3. SRI. RAMANJINI K, S/O. LATE SRI. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/A NO.16, KEMPATHIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 4. SRI. JAYARAMA K @ JAYANNA, S/O. LATE SRI. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/A NO.16, KEMPATHIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20136 WP No. 10808 of 2026 KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VEERAYYA HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BEERASANDRA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 4. THE TAHASILDHAR, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, AND SURVEY SETTLEMENTS, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) DIRECT THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20136 WP No. 10808 of 2026 RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 5 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 28.11.2023, 09.01.2026 AND 24.01.2026 AS PER ANNEXURE P TO P2 BY ISSUE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION AS THE CASE MAY BE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.4-Tahsildar, Devanahalli Taluk and respondent No.5- Assistant Director of Land Records, Devanahalli Taluk, have not acted upon the application given by the petitioners on 28.11.2023 at Annexure-P, 09.01.2026 at Annexure-P1 and 24.01.2026 at Annexure-P2, for phodi and durast of 2 acres of land in Survey No.66 of Kempathimmanahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20136 WP No. 10808 of 2026 3. Learned High Court Government Pleader, however, submits on instructions that the application filed by the petitioners has been taken up for consideration, but, since the petitioners have not furnished the original grant orders, the file has been forwarded to the Committee for building up missing records. 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, having regard to the entry found in the RTC at Annexure-N for the years 2023-2024 and the name of the petitioners finding place in the RTC in column No.9 and the information available in column No.10 shows that the mutation entry is carried out in terms of MR No.H4/2023-24 dated 31.08.2023, the authorities cannot say that they have no information regarding the original grant orders. Without verifying the original grant orders, the name of the petitioners could not have been entered in the RTC. Nevertheless, if the petitioners have any information regarding the original grant, they are permitted to submit the same before the respondent-Tahsildar, within a period of fifteen days from today. The Tahsildar shall look into the documents that would be supplied by the petitioners and if the Tahsildar is - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20136 WP No. 10808 of 2026 satisfied regarding the grant, he may proceed to consider the application filed by the petitioners for phodi and durast. On the other hand, if the material supplied by the petitioners does not satisfy the requirement, then the Committee for missing records may proceed to consider the request made by the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13