Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28903 (PNJ)

SANDEEP v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/29400/2026 · 2026-07-13

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-29400-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (103) CRM-M-29400-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Sandeep ... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Nidhi, Advocte, and Mr. Mandeep Singh Kundu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Addl. A.G., Haryana **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 (Section 438 Cr.P.C.) in case bearing FIR No.5 dated 12.01.2026 under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS (Sections 406, 420, 506 and 34 IPC) registered at Police Station City Safidon, District Jind. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 04.06.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State counsel on instructions from SI Narender Singh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of the order dated 04.06.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.13 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM-M-29400-2026 (O & M) In view of the above, the interim order dated 04.06.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. The petition stands disposed of. July 13, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.13 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh