Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2890 (ORI)

RASMITA SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/3405/2026 · 2026-02-27

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 3405 of 2026 Rasmita Sahoo `…. Petitioner Represented by Mr. P.Mohanty, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha & Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by Ms. U.Padhi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 27.02.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned State counsel requests further time to obtain instructions. This Court is not inclined to grant any further time. 3. Considering the innocuous prayer made by the petitioner, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner is that his rent is not being accepted on the ground that the lands particulars have not been uploaded in the Bhulekh Portal. Uploading of the land particulars to the Bhulekh Portal is within the domain of the State authorities, citizens cannot be blamed for the same. 4. The writ application is therefore, disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Jatni to accept the rent to be paid by the petitioner in respect of the property in question, after verifying the particulars Order No. 02. 2 | P a g e from the relevant records irrespective of whether the particulars have been uploaded to the Bhulekh Portal or not. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak