Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28895 (PNJ)

SUKHJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8197/2026 · 2026-07-13

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP No.8197 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 166 CRWP No.8197 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :13.07.2026 Sukhjeet Kaur and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate the petitioners. Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab. SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) : 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their life and liberty from the respondents No.4 to 6. 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) before the respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only. 4. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab, has appeared on behalf of respondent-State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.13 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRWP No.8197 of 2026 (O&M) 2 representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order and communicate to the petitioners in writing. 6. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided adequate safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is, however, clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. The police authority of District Sangrur shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Manoj Bhutani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.13 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document