- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34767 WP No. 19145 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19145 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B. GOPALAKRISHNA SON OF BRAHAMANANDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT JAPTHIHOSAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34767 WP No. 19145 of 2026 4. THE TAHSILDAR SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, SIDDLAGHATTA, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 5. SRI. ERANNA SON OF MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT BODAGURU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 6. SMT. MUNIRATHANAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT BODAGURU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 7. SMT. SUMA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, WIFE OF MUNIRAJU R/AT DABARAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 8. SMT. SAVITHA WIFE OF HARISH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT GANIGA HOSAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34767 WP No. 19145 of 2026 9. SMT. ASHA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE VENKATESHAPPA RESIDING AT BODAGURU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 10. SMT. ASHA WIFE OF MUNIRAJU DAUGHTER OF MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT BODAGURU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 11. SRI. P. SHRINIVASA GOWDA SON OF LATE M. PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT V.G.T ROAD SIDDLAGHATTA TOWN SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR-562101. 12. SRI.B.K.RAJANNA SON OF KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT BODAGURU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR-562101. 13. M/S NORTH EAST PROPERTIES A PROPRIETARY CONCERN - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34767 WP No. 19145 of 2026 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. H.SURESH SON OF LATE. G. HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. 106, 3RD FLOOR, PSR PLAZA, 10TH CROSS, CBI ROAD, GANGA NAGAR, BENGALURU -560032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-A, DATED 21-3-2025 PASSED IN R.A.NO.22/2022-23 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, CONSEQUENTLY, CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 2-3-2020 PASSED IN RA(SHID) NO.246/2019-20 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND ORDER TO RESTORE THE MUTATION ORDER IN MR NO.H4/2014-15 AT ANNEXURE -B IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND MEASURING 1 ACRE 39 GUNTAS INCLUDING 2 GUNTAS KARAB SITUATED AT JAPTHIHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34767 WP No. 19145 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for Respondents Nos. 1 to 4. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 21.03.2025 (Annexure-A) passed by Respondent No. 2 and the order dated 02.03.2020 (Annexure-B) passed by Respondent No. 3, seeking restoration of the mutation entry in the name of the petitioner. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon careful consideration of the impugned orders, it is evident that the mutation was effected in M.R. No. H4/2014-15 on the basis of a registered Sale Deed executed in favour of - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34767 WP No. 19145 of 2026 Respondent No. 13. It is also forthcoming from the records that the land in question has been converted. 5. In that view of the matter, the findings recorded by both the authorities are proper and do not call for any interference by this Court. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25