AKTARUL SK @ EKTARUL SK @ KALU v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/1753/2026 · 2026-07-20
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28889 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28889 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L926 20.07.2026 Bpg. dismissed
C.R.M. (A) 1753 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No.1301 of 2025 dated 03.10.2025 under Sections 21(c)/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985;
Aktarul Sk @ Ektarul Sk @ Kalu. Versus The State of West Bengal
Mr. Santanu Talukdar Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Saha Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay. …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there has been no recovery from the present petitioner and the petitioner has been implicated on the basis of statement of co- accused.
On the other hand, learned advocate for the State refers to CRM(A)4364 of 2025 wherein another accused similarly placed whose prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected as there were CDRs and money trail. According to the State, so far as the present petitioner is concerned, there are CDRs available.
Having considered the overall circumstances including the directions passed in respect of the other accused, I am not
2 inclined to grant relief as prayed for.
Thus, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in CRM(A)1753 of 2026 is dismissed.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)