Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28886 (PNJ)

SUDHIR SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/4115/2026 · 2026-07-13

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 114 CWP-4115-2026 Date of Decision:-13.07.2026 Sudhir Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Godara, Advocate for Mr. Munish Khanngwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ***** VIKAS BAHL , J.(Oral) 1. On 11.02.2026, the Coordinate Division Bench of this Court has passed the following order: “Present: Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Munish Khanngwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * On request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, adjourned to 13.07.2026. 11.02.2026” GEETA RANI 2026.07.13 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh CWP-4115-2026 (O&M) ( 2 ) 2. Today again, a request for adjournment has been made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner without filing any adjournment slip. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the same has submitted that the present petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same when the counsel for the petitioner is ready to argue the matter and in case any cause survives. 4. Ordered accordingly. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 13.07.2026 Geeta GEETA RANI 2026.07.13 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh