Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28877 (PAT)

Nashim Ansari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./46103/2026 · 2026-08-13

Alok Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46103 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2026 Thana- DANDKHORA District- Katihar ====================================================== Nashim Ansari Son of Late Gafur Ansari Resident of Saharpura, Govind Chowk, P.S.- Dand Khora, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dand Khora P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that on the instruction of the co-accused, petitioner assaulted the informant by means of Dabiya as a result of which the informant sustained injury. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2026 and after investigation, the Charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. The counsel lastly submits that petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46103 of 2026(3) dt.13-08-2026 2/3 and informant are neighbours. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the fact that the injury is simple in nature and also considering the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Dand Khora P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or close member. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause. (III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial. In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46103 of 2026(3) dt.13-08-2026 3/3 the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. manish/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T