- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010008992026 NC: 2026:KHC:36440 RP No. 6 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REVIEW PETITION NO. 6 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. MR. HENRY COUTINHO AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O. LATE RAYMOND COUTINHO RESIDING AT: GC-1 GANESH SAGAR APARTMENTS 1ST CROSS ROAD, SHIVABAGH KADRI, MANGALORE - 575 002. THROUGH GPA HOLDER MR. LIONEL RASQUINHA …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAKESH KINI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. N. M. A. SIDDIQ AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O. LATE M. BEARY RESIDING AT DOOR NO. 8-14-1206/1 CPC COMPOUND KUDROLI, MANGALURU - 575 003. 2. MR. VASANTH KAMATH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O. LATE GOPAL KRISHNA KAMATH RESIDING AT MAHAMAYA 2ND CROSS ROAD, SHIVABAGH KADRI, KANKANADY POST MANGALORE - 575 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N.S.SRIRAJ GOWDA,ADVOCATE FOR R2; R1 SERVED - UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010008992026 NC: 2026:KHC:36440 RP No. 6 of 2026 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17.11.2025 PASSED IN W.P.NO.27896/2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER The present review petition is filed seeking review the impugned order dated 17.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.27896/2025 by this Court. 2. There is a delay of 18 days in filing the present review petition. 3. This Court, by an order dated 17.11.2025, disposed of the writ petition by passing the following order: "i) The petition is disposed off; ii) I Additional Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mangaluru is directed to dispose off the appeal in R.A.No.59/2025 expeditiously; - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010008992026 NC: 2026:KHC:36440 RP No. 6 of 2026 iii) It is needless to mention that the first Appellate Court shall provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the parties." 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at the time of disposal of the writ petition, he had filed a memo restricting the prayer for issuance of a direction to the first Appellate Court for expeditious disposal of R.A.No.59/2025. Therefore, it is contended that a specific time frame may now be fixed for disposal of the said appeal. 5. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for petitioner. However, I do not find any good ground or cogent reason to accept the said submission. 6. Accepting the memo filed by the learned counsel for petitioner, this Court had disposed of the writ petition by directing the first Appellate Court to dispose of the appeal in R.A.No.59/2025 expeditiously. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010008992026 NC: 2026:KHC:36440 RP No. 6 of 2026 7. It is now submitted by the learned counsels for parties that arguments in the appeal have already been concluded and that the matter has been reserved for pronouncement of orders. Thus, nothing further remains to be done by the first Appellate Court except to pronounce its judgment. 8. Petitioner in this review petition seeks reconsideration of the matter to fix a time frame, but this Court has already directed the trial Court to decide the appeal in RA.No.59/2025 expeditiously. Hence, no further order is required and does not call for review of the order. In the above circumstances, I do not find any good ground or cogent reason to entertain the present review petition. Accordingly, the review petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN\List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17