Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28875 (PNJ)

SNEH LATA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CWP/1524/2002 · 2026-07-10

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[217] Sneh Lata, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Nimriwali, Tehsil and District State of Haryana and another Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] present writ petition [2] [3] disposed off 10.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1524 Date of Decision : Sneh Lata, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Nimriwali, Tehsil and District Bhiwani versus State of Haryana and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Senior DAG, Haryana. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for writ petition has become rendered infructuous Dismissed as infructuous. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands off. 10.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1524-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Senior DAG, Haryana. ounsel for the petitioner states that the has become rendered infructuous by efflux of time. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No states that the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.13 15:08 I agree to specified portions of this document