Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28870 (KAR)

SRI K ANANDA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12779/2026 · 2026-07-14

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35622 WP No. 12779 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.12779 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. ANANDA KUMAR S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.15, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MADHURA NAGARA NAGARABHAVI, NEAR MADHURAMMA TEMPLE, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU - 560072. 2. SRI. RAHUL B.J. S/O LATE JAYARAM S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.15, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MADHURA NAGARA NAGARABHAVI, NEAR MADHURAMMA TEMPLE, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU - 560072. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARSHITHA SURESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VAMSHI KRISHNA C., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35622 WP No. 12779 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR GANDHI NAGAR BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION AND THE APPLICATION DATED 07.03.2026 (ANNEXURE-A) IN A FAIR AND TIME-BOUND MANNER, AND TO FORTHWITH CONDUCT SURVEY AND DEMARCATION OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY SO AS TO IDENTIFY AND REMOVE ENCROACHMENTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35622 WP No. 12779 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents have not undertaken Durast and Phodi work in respect of the land in question. In this regard, the petitioners have submitted representation vide Annexure- A, dated 07.03.2026 and same is pending consideration before the respondent-authorities. 3. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits that applications seeking Durast and Phodi are required to be made through the designated online portal and that, upon such application being submitted, the same would be considered in accordance with law. 4. Having regard to the said submission, this Court is of the view that no direction as sought for can be issued at this stage, as the petitioners have not availed the prescribed statutory procedure by submitting an application through the online portal. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35622 WP No. 12779 of 2026 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are reserved liberty to submit an appropriate application through the designated online portal seeking Durast and Phodi work in respect of the land in question. If such an application is submitted, the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law and take an appropriate decision within a reasonable period. 6. With the above observations and liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22