MOHD. TAUSIF @ TAUSIF KOKO S/O. MOHD. RAFIK SHA v. STATE OF GUJARAT
CR.MA/18228/2026 · 2026-08-13
Sanjeev J Thaker
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2887 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2887 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
R/CR.MA/18228/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 18228 of 2026 ========================================================== MOHD. TAUSIF @ TAUSIF KOKO S/O. MOHD. RAFIK SHA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR CHIRAG M MEVAWALA(14159) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 13/08/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. This is an application for temporary bail on the ground of mother’s illness.
2. Earlier, i.e. on 06.08.2026, learned advocate Ms.J.C. Bhatt has submitted that she has instructions to appear for and on behalf of the applicant and will file her vakalatnama in place of learned advocate Mr.Chirag M. Mevawala. However, the cause list shows that she did not file her vakalatnama till date.
3. Be that as it may. However, today, when the matter is called out, neither learned advocate Mr.Mevawala is present nor learned advocate Ms.Bhatt remained present on behalf of the applicant nor learned advocate Ms.Bhatt has filed her vakalatnama replacing learned advocate
R/CR.MA/18228/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026 Mr.Mevawala for the applicant nor any mention is made for adjournment on behalf of the applicant.
4. Considering the fact that this application is filed by the applicant for temporary bail on the ground of his mother’s illness, however, the matter could not be proceeded for one reason or the other.
5. Today, learned APP has placed on record the jail remarks.
6. Considering the jail remarks, it transpires that the applicant was remained absconded for 08 days and 10 days, respectively, in the year 2025 while he was released temporarily. Further, his jail conduct is also not good.
7. Moreover, the medical paper annexed to this application at Annexure-‘C’ (Page-17) does not inspire any confidence.
8. In view of above, this application needs to be rejected on the ground of conduct of the applicant, stale cause and in absence of justifiable grounds/reasons and is rejected accordingly.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J) M.H. DAVE/83 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/08/2026 17:42:14