Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28860 (MAD)

Anbucheliyan @ Anbu v. The State Rep.By

CRL OP/13008/2026 · 2026-06-02

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 13008 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 13008 of 2026 Anbucheliyan @ Anbu S/o Thiyagarajan No.21, Sarawathivasaga Salai, Kalaignar Karunanidhi Nagar, Madurai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.By Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-1 Chennai In Crime No.13 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner that Para 5(b) the petitoner shall deposit a sum XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court Chennai to the Credit of Crime No.13/2026 in Crl.M.P.No.3145 of 2026 dated 16.04.2026 passed the learned Principle Sessions judge, Chennai and thereby render Justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Ms.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13008 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking modification of the condition imposed upon the petitioner in paragraph No. 5(b) in Crl.M.P.No.3145 of 2026 dated 16.04.2026 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai that the petitioner should deposit a sum of Rs. 9,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakh Only) before the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court Chennai to the credit of crime No. 13/2026. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is unable to arrange the conditional deposit amount of Rs.9,00,000/-. He further submitted that as the amount is huge and the petitioner's family is in a highly indigent and poor condition, with no one to financially assist him to comply with the condition order. Hence, he prayed for modification of the said condition. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the Petitioner is unable to comply the conditional order of this Court. Hence, he opposed to allow this petition. 4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on records. 5. A perusal of the order reveals that such condition was imposed only based upon the voluntarily statement made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Hence, there are no grounds to modify the condition, further this Court does not find any reason to modify the condition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13008 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 02-06-2026 Vv To 1. The Principal Session Judge, Chennai 2. The XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai 3. Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-1 Chennai. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13008 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VV CRL OP No. 13008 of 2026 02-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13008 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis