Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28858 (CAL)

XXXX v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/1242/2026 · 2026-07-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.453. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 1242 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nakashipara Police Station case no. 72 of 2026 dated 21.01.2026 under Sections 115(2)/64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : XXXX ……Petitioner. Mr. Santanu Talukdar Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Mr. Amaan Dee Gupta .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, Ld. APP Ms. Rima Banerjee Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay ……for the State. Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for five months, charge-sheet has been submitted and there is no possibility of the trial being concluded very soon. As such, the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. along with the statement of the neighbours. The case is yet to be committed to the Court of Sessions. Accordingly, I direct that the petitioner be better advised to approach this Court after the stage of consideration are over. At this stage, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. 2 Accordingly, CRM (M) 1242 of 2026 is dismissed at this stage. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)