1 CGHC010399452018 2026:CGHC:31666 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 232 of 2019 1 - Babloo Singh S/o Devnarayan Singh Aged About 25 Years Posted As Guard At Central Jail, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Khajuri, Post Tahsil And Police Station Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Jail And Reformative Services Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Inspector General (Jail) Cum Jail Superintendent Central Jail Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Jail Superintendent Central Jail Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None For Respondents-State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 24/07 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- 2 “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/direction to quash the impugned order dated 12.06.2018 (Annexure P/1), consequently the order dated 09.11.2017 (Annexure P/5) may also be quashed directing the respondent to give the entire service benefit to the petitioner with all consequential benefits. 10.2 Any other relief/reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, with cost of the petition, may also please be granted to the petitioner.” 2. Perusal of the records and order-sheets would show that, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 07.11.2025. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. 4. In the aforementioned facts of the case, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY