IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58380 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-714 Year-2025 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Bickey Giri @ Sadhu Giri son of Munna Giri Resident of Mohalla- Gausganj, Satpahari Dipo, Police Station- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Krishna Jha, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ara Town P.S Case no.714 of 2025 registered under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on information having been received and a raid being conducted, four accused persons namely Dashai Kumar, Sahil Kumar, Rikki Kumar and Bholu Kumar were arrested. Various incriminating articles as mentioned in the FIR were recovered from their possession. It is further stated that on enquiry, co- accused Dashai Kumar disclosed that Himanshu Sharma was involved in the murder of their friend Sikandar Bind. It was to take revenge that the petitioner Bickey Giri got involved, he Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58380 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/3 took a supari of Rs. 2 lacs and also provided the firearm. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the FIR itself, it would transpire that the incriminating article has been recovered from the four accused who were arrested by the informant. The only material against the petitioner is the statement of co-accused made before police. Three of the four co-accused who were caught by the informant have been granted bail by the learned Court below by the orders which have been brought on record as Annexure-P/2 series to this petition. The petitioner is in custody 16.5.2026 and undertakes to cooperate in the investigation. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner’s possession and the petitioner having remained in custody since 16.5.2026, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Ara Town P.S Case no.714 of 2025 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58380 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 3/3 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara on the following conditions :- (I) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall make himself available to the Investigating Officer as and when required. (II) The petitioner shall remain physically present/ properly represented in the learned Court below on each date of the case/trial and shall cooperate in the trial. (III) In case the learned trial Court is of the opinion that the trial is being delayed due to non-cooperation on part of the petitioner, the learned trial Court may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody till conclusion of the trial. Shiv/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T