Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28847 (CAL)

SK SAMUR @ SAMUR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1297/2026 · 2026-07-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L70 17.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (NDPS)1297 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Ratua Police Station Case No.155 of 2026 dated 09.02.2026 under Sections 21(c)/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Sk. Samur @ Samur Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Kaushik Biswas Ms. Sudipa Das. …for the petitioner. Mr. Gurudas Mitra Mr. Utsov Dutta. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of recovery in the present case is of 25 bottles of codeine phosphate from the possession of another accused. There has been no recovery from the present petitioner, as such, petitioner prays for bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the investigation of the case is still still in progress. Having considered the submissions of the learned advocate for the State that the investigation is in progress, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. However, the learned trial court would assess if there is no further recovery in 2 connection with the instant case apart from 25 bottles of codeine phosphate which has already been seized after submission of charge-sheet, petitioner be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned special court deems fit and proper. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(NDPS)1297 of 2026 is disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)