HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3214/2026 Raghuraj S/o Bharat Singh, R/o Khirkari Atiraj Ka Pura, Police Station Sadar Baadi, District Dholpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner is confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 26/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 50/2017 registered at Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353 of IPC and Section 3, 25 of Arms Act. However, after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed by the Investigation Agency, under section 147, 148, 149, 307, 353 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present matter pertains to bail jump. After getting benefit of bail, the petitioner went out of State for earning livelihood, therefore, he could not appear before the learned Trial Court on the concerned date and as such, his bail bonds were forfeited. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2026. Learned counsel also undertakes that the petitioner shall appear (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3214/2026] before the learned Trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the Court and the petitioner shall not make any attempt to jump the bail again, therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the undertaking of the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that henceforth the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the learned Trial Court, without expressing any opinion on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Raghuraj S/o Bharat Singh is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, out of whom one surety should be a close relative of the petitioner, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in second week of every month, till trial is concluded. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3214/2026] 7. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 8. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. 9. It is made clear that in case of further misuse of liberty of bail, subsequent prayer of bail on behalf of the petitioner shall not be considered. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/145