Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34764 WP No. 10761 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.10761 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI P DAS S/O LATE P.N.PANCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.56, 2ND CROSS, NEAR SAMBHRAM COLLEGE, BHEL LAYOUT, M.S PALYA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU-560097. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA K.B., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE BENGALURU DISTRICT AND RAMANAGARA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., NO.6, LAXMI SADAN, 5TH MAN, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR AND RECOVERY OFFICER, BENGALURU, 441, THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34764 WP No. 10761 of 2026
BENGALURU-560 018. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BIDADI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT- 562109 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO REMOVE THE NAME OF THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ENTERED IN ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE AND RTC COLMUM NO.11 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY ANNEXURES - 'A' AND 'B'; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34764 WP No. 10761 of 2026
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 not to initiate any proceedings against the petitioner in respect of petition schedule property, inter-alia, has also sought a direction to remove the names of Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 from the Encumbrance Certificate and the RTC extracts. 4. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that no negative direction/writ can be issued to the respondent-authorities restraining them from performing their statutory or public duties. In that view of the matter, the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted. 5.
It is, however, open to the petitioner to approach the competent authority to avail such other remedy as may be available in law, in the event any
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34764 WP No. 10761 of 2026
action is taken by the respondent-authorities affecting the rights of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19