Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28825 (CAL)

SK. NASIBUDDIN @ SEKH NOSIBUDDIN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1254/2026 · 2026-07-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L464 17.07.2026 Bpg. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 1254 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023filed in connection with Dubrajpur Police Station Case No.234 of 2024 dated 21.08.2024 under Sections 118(2)/109/75/3(5)/126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 adding Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Sk Nasibuddin @ Sekh Nosibuddin Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Dhiman Banerjee Mr. Quazi Ezaz Ahmed. …for the petitioner. Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Neel Chakraborty. …for the State. Mr. Kunal Ganguly Ms. Diksha Ghosh. …for the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 1 year 10 months and is similarly situated as the other accused person who has been granted bail in CRM(M)339 of 2026. Learned advocate for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the accused who has been released on bail has violated the conditions and he has been threatening the witnesses. To that effect, information has been sent to the appropriate authority. 2 Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that in the present case the deceased was assaulted with bricks and bamboos. There were recoveries of bamboos pursuant to the leading statement of this petitioner. I have taken into account the overall circumstances and the genesis of the dispute. Having considered the same, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. The petitioner, namely, Sk Nasibuddin @ Sekh Nosibuddin be released on bail by the learned trial court on same terms and conditions as was imposed upon Sk. Sanikul @ Sekh Sanikul in CRM(M)339 of 2026. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(M)1254 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)