17.07.2026 Serial no. 440 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 1226 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Lalgola PS Case No. 220 of 2026 dated 25.03.2026 u/s 69/351(2) of the BNS, 2023 [GR No. 1083 of 2026]. -And- In the matter of : Najibul Hoque … Petitioner(s) Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr Adv. Mr. U. A. Dewan Mr. Asif Dewan Md. Muslehuddin … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Gurudas Mitra Mr. Utsav Dutta … for the State-respondent(s) Learned Senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 113 days and charge-sheet has already been submitted on 14.05.2026. Learned Senior advocate also submits that the prosecution has relied upon 16 witnesses in support of its case. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and emphasizes on the accusations made in the complaint including the factum of false promise to marry. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary and having regard to the period of detention of the present petitioner including the fact that some time will be required to take the trial to its logical conclusion, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Najibul Hoque shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned ACJM, Lalbagh. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case. Additionally, the ACJM, Lalbagh and/or the learned trial court would be at liberty to impose further condition(s) for ensuring appearance of the present petitioner in course of the trial Accordingly, CRM (M) 1226 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3