Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 288 (KAR)

THE DIRECTOR v. SMT PARVEEN TAJ

MFA/4179/2021 · 2026-03-12

K Manmadha Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14855 MFA No. 4179 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4179 OF 2021 (MV-D) BETWEEN: THE DIRECTOR, KGID (VEHICLE DEPARTMENT), 16TH FLOOR VISHWESHWARIAH TOWER DR. B R AMBEDKAR STREET BENGALURU - 560 001. (R.C. OWNER OF TRACTOR ENGINE BEARING REG NO. KA-42-G-0925) …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BHOJEGOUDA T. KOLLER., AGA) AND: SMT PARVEEN TAJ SINCE DEAD BY LR R1 TO R5 AND ANOTHER 1. SMT. SHEERING TAJ W/O MOHAMMED ZIYAULLA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 2. SRI. ABDUL MAZID S/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 3. SMT. HEENA PARVEEZ W/O SUBHAN SAB AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 4. SRI MOHAMMED KUDRATH S/O LT ABDUL RAZAK Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14855 MFA No. 4179 of 2021 AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 5. SRI ABDUL WAJED S/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT 1ST CROSS KHALAQ NAGARA KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA -562 117. 6. THE CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, KANAKAPURA TOWN RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. MAHADEVASWAMY.,ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-6) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08.03.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.7498/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SCJ AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT-3, BENGALURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.9,34,043/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSIT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14855 MFA No. 4179 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT Heard the submissions of learned AGA and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed a copy of the judgment in MFA No.1196/2022 dated 15.02.2024. A perusal of the said judgment discloses that the respondents herein had preferred the said appeal challenging the judgment and award dated 08.03.2021 passed in MVC No.7498/2018 on the file of the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, ACMM and MACT-3, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru (for short, “the Tribunal”), on the ground that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and meager. After hearing both sides, this Court partly allowed MFA No.1196/2022 and modified the award by enhancing the compensation to a sum of Rs.10,30,043/- as against Rs.9,34,043/- awarded by the Tribunal, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition till realization. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14855 MFA No. 4179 of 2021 3. In view of MFA No.1196/2022 having been partly allowed and the compensation having already been modified by this Court, the present appeal filed by the appellant seeking to set aside the judgment and award dated 08.03.2021 passed in MVC No.7498/2018 on the file of the VII Additional Small Causes Judge and ACMM, Member, MACT-3, Bengaluru, does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52