Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 288 (ALL)

DEEPAK KUMAR MANGAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/654/2026 · 2026-03-17

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 654 of 2026 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard. 2. At the outset learned counsel for the State respondents has raised a preliminary objection qua the maintainability of the instant writ petition. He submits that qua the same dispute the Division Bench has already entertained Public Interest Litigation, which is likely to be listed on 20th March, 2026. Filing of a second writ petition is not permissible as per the High Court Rules. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in this backdrop, fairly submits that this writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with the leave to press the relief in ongoing proceeding in PIL No. 306 of 2026. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed, as not pressed. 5. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh and Sri A.K. Goel, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. March 18, 2026 gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Bhanu Shukla, Shubhangini Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Deepak Kumar Mangal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad