IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.625 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Devendra Singh S/o Late Jayram Singh R/o Village - Hathiyakandh, P.S - Sahpur, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar at Patna Bihar 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, District - Patna Bihar 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Danapur, District - Patna Bihar 5. The Officer-in-Charge, Sahpur Police Station, District - Patna Bihar 6. The Investigating Officer, Sahpur P.S Case no. 300/2025 Bihar 7. Dhananjay Kumar S/o Late Ganesh Singh R/o Village - Hathiyakandh, P.S - Sahpur, District - Patna 8. Rahul Kumar S/o Shakendra Singh R/o Village - Hathiyakandh, P.S - Sahpur, District - Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Madhukar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar , AC to GP- 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 21-08-2026 The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondent authorities to properly investigate Sahpur P.S. Case No. 300 of 2025 and file proper report under Section 193 of the BNSS against the accused persons. 02. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State/respondents and from the counter affidavit it transpires that charge sheet has been submitted on 22.10.2025 vide charge sheet no. 647 of 2025 and subsequently, a supplementary charge Patna High Court CR. WJC No.625 of 2026(2) dt.21-08-2026 2/2 sheet has been submitted on 31.03.2026 vide supplementary charge sheet no. 175 of 2026. It has also been submitted that the investigation in the matter has been completed and charge sheet has been submitted against the accused persons as well as the private respondents and hence, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 03. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner admits that the charge sheet has been submitted after completion of investigation though he submits that it was after much delay. 04. Since the prayer of the petitioner does not survive for consideration after filing of charge sheet and completion of investigation in Sahpur P.S. Case No. 300 of 2025, the present writ petition stands disposed of as such. Anuradha/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T