- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36040 RSA No. 113 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 113 OF 2022 (DEC) BETWEEN: SRI. C.R. NAGARAJU S/O. LATE REVANASIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.608, 68TH CROSS, 14TH MAIN, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560078 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAGARAJA H., ADVOCATE (AB)) AND: 1. SRI. MRUTHYNJAYA, S/O. LATE T.H. BASAVARAJAPPA @ BASETTAPPA AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/A NO.X.73, GRAIN BAZAAR CITY MARKET, BENGALURU - 02 2. SRI. NATARAJA S/O. LATE T.H. BASAVARAJAPPA @ BASETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PRESENT ADDRESS, NO 666, 1ST FLOOR 11TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR (NEXT TO KALANJALI) BENGALURU - 560 011 Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36040 RSA No. 113 of 2022 3. SMT. LAKKAMMA, W/O LATE ANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 4. SRI. KEMPARAJU S/O. LATE ANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 5. SRI. THIMMEGOWDA S/O. LATE ANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 6. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O. LATE ANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 6 ARE R/A GANGAPPANAHALLI, TAVAREKERE - HOBLI, THIPPAGONDANAHALLY - PO. BENGALURU - SOUTH TALUK. BENGALURU - 562 130 7. SRI. GANGA REVANNA, S/O. LATE CHICKALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/A CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, TAVAREKERE - HOBLI, BENGALURU - SOUTH TALUK. BENGALURU - 560 032 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.09.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO.14/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.12.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.148/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36040 RSA No. 113 of 2022 THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant. On the last date of hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant retired from the case and the appellant, who was present before the Court sought time to engage another advocate. Taking note of the fact that the appeal is of the year 2022, Court granted two days time to engage another advocate. Today, appellant is absent and no advocate is engaged by the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE VBS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69