Akbar Sultan v. State rep. by the Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/12894/2026 · 2026-06-02
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28784 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28784 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 12894 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 12894 of 2026 Akbar Sultan S/o. Naina Mohammed, No.5, Keela Sunnambukara Street, Alangudi, Pudukottai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-1 Chennai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner that para 5(b) the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakh Only) before the learned XXVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court for trail of CCB cases (relating to cheating case in chennai) and CBCID Metro cases, Chennai. To the credit of crime No. 13/2026 in Crl.M.P.No.3441 of 2026 dated 20.04.2026 passed by the learned Principal Session Judge, Chennai and thereby render Justice. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12894 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Ms.R.S.Indira Govt.Advocate (crl.Side ) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking modification of the condition imposed upon the petitioner in paragraph No. 5(b) in Crl.M.P.No.3441 of 2026 dated 20.04.2026 that the petitioner shoud deposit a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakh Only) before the learned XXVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court for trail of CCB cases (relating to cheating case in chennai) and CBCID Metro cases, Chennai to the credit of crime No. 13/2026 passed by the learned Principal Session Judge, Chennai. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is unable to arrange the conditional deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. He further submitted that as the amount is huge and the petitioner's family is in a highly indigent and poor condition, with no one to financially assist him to comply with the condition order. Hence, he prayed for modification of the said condition. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the Petitioner is unable to comply the conditional order of this Court. Hence, he opposed to allow this petition. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12894 of 2026
4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on records. 5. A perusal of the order reveals that such condition was imposed only based upon the voluntarily statement made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Hence, there are no grounds to modify the condition and this Court does not find any reason to modify the condition. 6.
Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 02-06-2026 Vv To
1. The Principal Session Judge, Chennai
2. The XXVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court for trail of CCB cases (relating to cheating case in chennai) and CBCID Metro cases, Chennai
3. Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-1 Chennai. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 02-06-2026 Vv __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12894 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN J. VV CRL OP No. 12894 of 2026 02-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12894 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis