Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28772 (CAL)

MD. MASIDUR RAHAMAN AND ORS. v. SHAILENDRA UTTAM, THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR (E.R.) AND ORS.

CPAN/2078/2025 · 2026-07-17

Biswaroop Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.07.2026 Item No.8 Ali ct. no.9 CPAN 2078 of 2025 Md. Masidur Rahaman & Ors. Vs. Shri Shailendra Uttam, The Regional Director (E.R.) & Ors. In WPA 23407 of 2025 Atish Mandal & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Debasish Kundu, Mr. Sudeepto Kumar Basu, Mr. Bidan Modak …… for the petitioners. Mr. Indrajit Dasgupta, Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Mr. Gourab Karmakar …..for the respondents/alleged contemnors. 1. Learned advocates for the parties are present. 2. The contemnors/respondents have filed affidavit of compliance of the order passed by this Court in terms of direction dated 03.07.2026. 3. The learned advocate for the petitioners does not dispute with regard to compliance of this order and it is submitted that the writ petitioners were permitted to appear in the medical examination and declared to be fit. 4. In the facts and circumstances, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this application. 2 5. Thus, this contempt application stands disposed. The authority shall proceed in accordance with law. (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)