Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28768 (CHH)

PRITHVIRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5559/2026 · 2026-07-22

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010268002026 2026:CGHC:31446 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5559 of 2026 Prithviraj Singh S/o Shri Munni Singh, Aged About 33 Years Occupation Dismissed Constable (No. 280, F Company, 15th Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Force, Dhanora, District Bijapur, C.G.), R/o Village Bhadakur, Post Bhadakur, Thana Koop, District Bhind (M.P.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters (P H Q), Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Inspector General Of Police, Chhattisgarh Armed Force (C A F), South Range (Bastar), Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 4. The Commandant, 15th Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Force (C A F), Dhanora, District Bijapur (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. lav Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 23/07/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has assailed the order of removal from service dated 25.03.2026 by preferring a statutory departmental appeal before respondent No. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.07.24 10:57:44 +0530 2 3 on 08.04.2026, which is still pending. He submits that despite lapse of considerable time, the appeal has not been decided, causing serious financial hardship to the petitioner. He, therefore, prays that respondent No. 3 be directed to decide the pending appeal within a stipulated period in accordance with law. 2. Learned State counsel submits that if the petitioner's statutory departmental appeal is pending consideration before the competent appellate authority, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of 40 days. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 4. Considering the limited relief sought by the petitioner and the submission made by learned State counsel, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner's statutory departmental appeal dated 08.04.2026 is still pending before the competent appellate authority, the same shall be considered and decided by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of 40 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti