Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28746 (PNJ)

SWATI RAJPOOT v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/17346/2026 · 2026-07-09

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-10413-CWP-2026 in/and CWP-17346-2026 Date of decision: 09.07.2026 SWATI RAJPOOT ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sahil Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. (through video conferencing) Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) CM-10413-CWP-2026 This is an application under Section 151 CPC for preponing the date of hearing. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner has submitted that since on 27.05.2026, an objection was raised that the impugned order is appealable, he wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appeal and thus, prays that the main case which is now listed for 29.07.2026 be preponed to today itself. On 27.05.2026, the Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Present: Mr. Sahil Singla, Advocate and Ms. Anusha Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. MANISHA 2026.07.13 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-10413-CWP-2026 in/and 2 CWP-17346-2026 Advance copy of the petition has been served upon respondents. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent and states that impugned order is appealable under Section 19 of The Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. On request of counsel for the petitioner, list on 29.07.2026.” Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances and the fair prayer made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner, to which there is no objection raised on behalf of the respondent, the CM is allowed and the main case is preponed from 29.07.2026 and is ordered to be taken on board today itself. MAIN CASE Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 09, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.13 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document