Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd v. Murugavel P
Arb Appln/12/2026 · 2026-06-04
K Kumaresh Babu
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28741 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28741 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Arb Appln No. 12 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Arb Appln No. 12 of 2026 Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Chola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4 Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai Represented by its Authorised Signatory ..Applicant(s) Vs Murugavel P. S/o.Periyasamy 35/12, Hudco Colony, Peelamedu, Near PSG Hospital, Coimbatore South, Tamil nadu 641 004. ..Respondent(s) Prayer This application filed to direct the Respondent to furnish security for the sum of Rs.2,40,651/- within a time fixed by this Honble Court failing which to order attachment of the immovable properties morefully described in the Schedule to the Judges Summons till enforcement of the award passed in the arbitration proceedings and a copy of the attachment order be transmitted through the Principal District Court, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu and the attachment order may be hand delivered to the applicant for transmission. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar For Respondent(s): No appearance O R D E R By order dated 09.02.2026, this Court had directed the respondent to furnish security to the tune of Rs.2,40,651/- and had also ordered notice returnable by 09.02.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Arb Appln No. 12 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3
2. On 09.02.2026, noting that the notice had been returned with an endorsement as ‘no such person’, this Court permitted the applicant to service of notice on the respondent through paper publication. Evidencing the paper publication, an affidavit of service had also been filed by the applicant on
25.02.2026. In spite of which, the respondent had neither chosen to appear in person nor represented through a counsel.
3. Already orders were passed directing to furnish the security the respondents had not chosen to defend himself. In view of the same, there shall be an order of attachment of the immovable property described in the judge's summons.
4. Registry is directed to transmit the order to the Sub Registrar Office, Kattuputhur, as well as to the Principal District Judge, Trichy.
5. With the above order, this Arbitration Application is disposed. 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Maya To
1. The Sub Registrar Office, Kattuputhur.
2. The Principal District Judge, Trichy. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Arb Appln No. 12 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Maya Arb Appln No. 12 of 2026 Dated : 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis