- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010103002017 NC: 2026:KHC:36390 WP No. 45750 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 45750 OF 2017 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR. SEENU, S/O. SANJEEVA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 2. MR. A.KUPPAIAH NAIDU, S/O. RATAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. MR. RAGHAVENDRA A., S/O. ADI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.60 SABARI HOLMES, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, GURURAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, J.P.NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU-560 078. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH KASTHURI B.R., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. M/S. VIJAYA BANK, ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH, SHRUTHA COMPLEX, NO.19, PRIMROSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 025. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010103002017 NC: 2026:KHC:36390 WP No. 45750 of 2017 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER MR. SACHIN KUMAR SHETTY. 2. MR. C.S.KODANDA RAMA RAJU, S/O. C.SHESMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.38/42, 8TH MAIN, 17TH CROSS, PADMANABHA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 070. 3. MR. SURESH YELAVARTHY, NO.201, SLV APARTMENT, 14TH MAIN, J.P.NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, PUTTENAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010103002017 NC: 2026:KHC:36390 WP No. 45750 of 2017 A perusal of the petition papers would reflect that the petition was filed in 2017. Now we are in July, 2026. The petition is pending for almost nine years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17