ARNAV SALES CORPORATION v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/9552/2026 · 2026-07-09
Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28712 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28712 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****
CWP-9552-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:09.07.2026 ARNAV SALES CORPORATION ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ….RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate Ms. Anjali Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Larish Setia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Samdisha Kaur, AAG, Punjab. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)
1.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 29.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) on the ground that it was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing. Violation of principles of natural justice is thus alleged.
2.
Learned State counsel, who has appeared on advance notice does not dispute the factual assertion that opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded to the petitioner. Learned State counsel, therefore, states that instead of keeping the matter pending it can be conveniently remitted back to the concerned authority, for conducting the proceedings afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.
3.
In view of the fair stand taken by the respondents, this matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, and the impugned order dated 29.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) is set aside. The respondents shall proceed RAHUL JOSHI 2026.07.13 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD
CWP-9552-2026 (O&M)
2 afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. It is further provided that no coercive action henceforth shall be taken in the matter and any recovery to be made shall abide by the fresh orders to be passed in accordance with law, including the recovery already made in the matter.
4.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
[ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE JULY 09, 2026 Rahul Joshi
1. Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
2. Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2026.07.13 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD