-1- CWP-18648 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18648 of 2026 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Davinder Kumar and others ….Petitioners versus The Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and another ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Simanpreet Kaur Dhawan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for the respondents. NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing i.e. 01.07.2026, the following order was passed: - “The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the over time allowance, which is payable to them in terms of regulations No.35 & 36 of para (iv) of Pepsu Road Transport Corporation (Conditions of Appointment & Service Regulation), 1981 alongwith interest as well as seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 28.08.2024 (Annexure P-4) passed by the respondents. On receipt of advance copy, Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, who is representing the respondents – Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, seeks time to get instructions. List again on 13.07.2026.” RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.13 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment -2- CWP-18648 of 2026 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the claim of petitioners No.1 to 4 has been satisfied except that a sum of Rs.26,632/- is due to be paid to petitioner No.1, which shall be released to him within a period of two weeks from today. With regard to petitioner No.5, it has been stated that his service record is not available and efforts are being made to trace his service record and to consider his claim for overtime allowance and shall be considered and disposed of within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. 3. Learned assisting counsel for the petitioners submits that though the claim of petitioners No.1 to 4 has already been satisfied, however, it appears that some more amount is due for which the aggrieved petitioners shall make a representation to the respondents within a period of four weeks from today and the same may be considered by the respondents in a time-bound manner. 4. If any such representation is submitted by any of the petitioners out of petitioners No.1 to 4 within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the respondents within a period of three months thereafter. 5. Disposed of. 13.07.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) R.S. JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.13 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment