- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476662019 NC: 2026:KHC:36698 CRL.P No. 8082 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8082 OF 2019 BETWEEN: R SRINIVAS S/O LATE RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O NO.51, GROUND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, BASAVESHWARA LAYOUT, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 040. NOW R/A NO.10, ITI LAYOUT, NAGARBHAVI, SECOND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 072. …PETITIONER [BY SRI SHAIKH SAOUD, ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: 1. THE STATE BY CHANDRA LAYOUT POLICE , REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. SULOCHANA PRABHU UDDI S/O PRABHU UDDI, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, NO.4, HOMBALI, CHALUKYANAGARA, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 072. 3. PRABHU UDDI S/O LATE DODDA BASAPPA UDDI, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476662019 NC: 2026:KHC:36698 CRL.P No. 8082 of 2019 NO.4, HOMBALI, CHALUKYANAGARA, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 072. 4. DR. KOTRESH SHARMA S/O LATE NAGBHUSHAN SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.4, HOMBALI, CHALUKYANAGARA, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 072. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAVEED S., HCGP FOR R1; SRI SURESH P., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; R4 - SERVED) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO a. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.03.2013 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BENGALURU IN RESPECT OF CR.NO.176/2012 U/S 3(1)(x) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT AND SECTION 506 R/W 34 OF IPC VIDE ANNEXURE-D. b. PERMIT TO CHALLENGE THE B- FINAL REPORT IN RESPECT OF CR.NO.176/2012 U/S 3(1)(x) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT AND SECTION 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AT ANNEXURE-D IN THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476662019 NC: 2026:KHC:36698 CRL.P No. 8082 of 2019 ORAL ORDER None appears for petitioner. Even on previous dates of hearing i.e. 19.06.2026 and 09.07.2026, there was no representation and matter was adjourned with clarification that no further adjournment could be granted. Continued absence indicates that petitioner is not diligently pursuing petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23