- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35797 RSA No. 247 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 247 OF 2021 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHOWDAMMA W/O. BHARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O. KARUR VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT 2. PARASURAM S/O. BHARAMAPPA, 42 YEARS R/O.NO. 11706, KARUR VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT. 3. SIDDAPPA S/O. BHARAMAPPA, 42 YEARS R/O.NO. 11706, KARUR VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH L.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT RENUAMMA W/O. H BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/O. 2/2, HPF, WORKERS COLONY, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35797 RSA No. 247 of 2021 KUMARAPATNAM, RANEBENNUR TALUK, HAVERI DISTRICT. 2. SMT. MANIKAMMA W/O. H.H. BASAVARAJ, 54 YEARS R/O. KARUR VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HALLI SHANTAPPA BASAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.09.2020 PASSED IN RA.NO.7/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.11.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.113/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANGERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that pursuant to the decree passed in O.S.No.113/2015 which was confirmed by the First Appellate Court in RA Nos.7/2018 and 10/2018, Final Decree Proceedings - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35797 RSA No. 247 of 2021 have been initiated in FDP No.31/2020 which is also concluded on 25.07.2023 by ordering for passing of the Final Decree Proceedings in terms of the decree passed in O.S.No.113/2015. 3. In the meantime, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that one of the plaintiffs namely Renukamma is interested in selling her share in favour of appellant No.1 – Chowdamma. Such an adjustment can always be done in the execution petition. 4. Further, if there is any grievance with regard to passing of the Final Decree Proceedings, appellants are at liberty to challenge the Final Decree. 5. With the above observation, appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71