RUBY JAN AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (POLICE / HOME)
WP(C)/71/2026 · 2026-01-22
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 287 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 287 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 17 Supplementary list HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 71/2026 CM (146/2026) Ruby Jan and Anr. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)…
Through: Mr. Junaid Bin Azad, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J and K and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI JUDGE
ORDER 22.01.2026
1. The petition is not properly presented as the signatures of the petitioners do not obtain at the right place in the prayer part, as such, the counsel for the petitioner is allowed to have the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file fresh one.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 22.01.2026
“Shahid Manzoor”