- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010320112016 NC: 2026:KHC:36395 RFA No. 947 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 947 OF 2016 (INJ) BETWEEN: SHRI. G.N. SATISH S/O LATE NARASIMHAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 238/1, 4TH MAIN, KHB COLONY, 1ST STAGE, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SRINIVAS K.B.S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SMT. SAVITHA M WIFE OF SRI. MANJUNATH A AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 28, 4TH CROSS, G.M.PALYA, NEW TIPPASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 075. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NAGARAJA KUMBLE, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.02.2016 PASSED IS OS.NO.3080/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010320112016 NC: 2026:KHC:36395 RFA No. 947 of 2016 AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR MANDATORY INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Even on the last date of occasion, the learned counsel for the appellant remained absent. The appeal is of the year 2016. It appears that the appellant is not interesting in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12