- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010626842025 NC: 2026:KHC:36452 RSA No. 1443 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1443 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. PUSHPA W/O LATE SANJEEVA B BANDARY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 2. SHRINIVAS., S/O LATE SANJEEVA B BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT THUMBE HOUSE, BANTWAL KASABA VILLAGE, BANTWAL POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K DISTRICT - 574 211. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR H.N, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SUNANDA W/O ANANDA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/AT HOLLA COMPOOUND, B.C. ROAD, NEAR MICRO STATION, JODUMARGA POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K DISTRICT - 574 219. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010626842025 NC: 2026:KHC:36452 RSA No. 1443 of 2025 2. SRI SANKAPPA BHANDARY, S/O LATE KUTTI BHANDARY, MAJOR, 3. SMT. SUJATHA, W/O NARAYANA BHANDARY, MAJOR 4. SMT. SUREKHA, W/O HARINATH, MAJOR 5. SRI. SUNIL, S/O SANKAPPA BHANDARY, MAJOR RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 5 ARE R/AT CHIKKA PUTTUR HOUSE, HARADI POST, NEAR RAILWAY QUARTERS, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 201. 6. MR. PURANDARA S/O LATE PREMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT PORKODI, BAJPE, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 142. 7. MRS. DEEPA D/O LATE PREMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT KOCCHILADI, KOTA, KUNDAPURA TALUK - 576 225. 8. MRS. ROOPA, D/O LATE PREMA, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010626842025 NC: 2026:KHC:36452 RSA No. 1443 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 9. MR. DIVAKAR, S/O LATE PREMA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 10. MR. PRABHAKAR, S/O LATE PREMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESPONDENT NO. 8 TO 10 ARE R/AT PORKODI, BAJPE, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 142. 11. SRI NARAYANA BHANDARY. S/O THUKRA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, 12. SMT. SHUBHA D/O NARAYANA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 13. SMT. SUMA D/O NARAYANA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 14. SMT. SUKANYA D/O NARAYANA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.11 TO 14 ARE R/AT PORKODY, PEJJAVARA POST, BAJPE, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 142. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010626842025 NC: 2026:KHC:36452 RSA No. 1443 of 2025 15. SRI. SUDHAKARA BHANDARY S/O LATE BABU BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT AJJIBETTU, B.C.ROAD, JODUMARGA POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 219. 16. SRI. GANGAHDARA R B S/O LATE RAMANNA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 17. SMT. CHANDRAKALA D/O LATE RAMANNA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 18. SRI. MOHAN BHANDARY S/O LATE RAMANNA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 19. SRI. VIJAYA BHANDARY S/O LATE RAMANNA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 20. SMT. THARA W/O RAM MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 21. SMT. MEERA S/O SUBHASH BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.16 TO 21 ARE R/AT SHILPA TRACK, NO.102A, SHIMPLI, OPP. SUVARNA HOSPITAL BORIVELI (EAST) MUMBAI - 400 092. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010626842025 NC: 2026:KHC:36452 RSA No. 1443 of 2025 22. DAKSHAYINI D/O LATE SANJEEVA BHANDARY, W/O NAGESH BHANDARY, MAJOR, R/AT PEREIRA COMPOUND, BHANDARIBETTU, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 211. 23. SMT. VEENA D/O LATE SANJEEVA BHANDARY, W/O PRAVEEN B, MAJOR, R/AT KUTHAYAR, "MATHRUCHAYA", KUTHYAR VILLAGE AND POST, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 504. 24. VASANTHI W/O BHOJARAJ BHANDARY, MAJOR, R/AT "MATHRUCHAYA", KUTHYAR VILLAGE AND POST, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 504. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAYANA K.N, ADVOCATE FOR R15) THIS RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.08.2025 PASSED IN RA.NO.9/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL, D.K., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.07.2019 PASSED IN OS.NO. 102/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL, D.K. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010626842025 NC: 2026:KHC:36452 RSA No. 1443 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Smt.Nayana K.N, learned counsel files vakalath for respondent No.15. The same is taken on record. 2. A memo is filed by learned counsel for the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The memo reads as under; "It is submitted that the parties to the present appeal have settled their dispute amicably due to the intervention of the family members and well-wishers. The above settlement will be reported to the FDP No.11/2022 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bantwal. Hence the appellants are not interested to pursue the present appeal. Hence by taking this memo on record this Hon'ble Court may be pleased dismiss the above appeal as not pressed in the interest of justice & equity." 3. Placing the memo on record, the appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE GH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1