CRWP-8192 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 124 KULWINDER KAUR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Present: SURYA PARTAP directions to respondent 2. the petitione P-4) before the respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 8192-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH KULWINDER KAUR & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Harsimran Singh Sidhu, Advocate for PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the official respondents to protect respondents No.4 to 12. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioner No.1 has filed the representation ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8192-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 13.07.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for Mr. Harsimran Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. . as been filed by the petitioners protect their life and liberty from the sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 03.07.2026 (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from the submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.13 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8192 4. of the respondents hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. 13.07.2026 Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 8192-2026 (O&M) 2 respondents No.1 to 3/State. Hence service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner No.1 (Annexure P order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. .2026 (SURYA P Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No accepts notice on behalf Hence service of notice upon the State is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE :Yes/No : Yes/No behalf Hence service of notice upon the State is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.13 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document