1 CGHC010274152023 2026:CGHC:31325 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3871 of 2023 1 - Smt. Shakuntala Verma W/o Kanhaiya Verma Aged About 53 Years Elected Panch Of Gram Panchayat Dongariyakhurd, Resident Of Gram Panchayat Dongariyakhurd, Tahsil - Pandaria, District - Kabirdham (C.G.). 2 - Smt. Siya Yadav W/o Santosh Yadav Aged About 39 Years Elected Panch Of Gram Panchayat Dongariyakhurd, Resident Of Gram Panchayat Dongariyakhurd, Tahsil - Pandaria, District - Kabirdham (C.G.). 3 - Smt. Chandrika Kurre W/o Ratan Kurre Aged About 48 Years Elected Panch Of Gram Panchayat Dongariyakhurd, Resident Of Gram Panchayat Dongariyakhurd, Tahsil - Pandaria, District - Kabirdham (C.G.). ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Additional Collector District - Kabirdham (C.G.). 3 - The Tahsildar Pandaria, District - Kabirdham (C.G.). 4 - Smt. Sadhna Kurre Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Dongariyakhurd, Tahsil - Pandaria, District - Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from CIS Periphery.) Digitally signed by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU 2 For Petitioners : Ms. Pranoti Das, counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate. For State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, P.L. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Utkarsh Shrivas, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/07/2026 1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to case of petitioners. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby quashing the impugned order dated 02.08.2023 (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 to consider whether rules, for prescribing the manner of making leave application, defining an authority to receive and decide application and the procedure to communicate to decision need to be framed under the Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Conduct of Business) Rules, 1994. 10.4 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. Heard. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance raised by the petitioners in the present petition has been redressed and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 3 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent No. 4 has no objection to the said prayer. 5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, and there being no objection from the respondents, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju