Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28678 (CHH)

PRIYA DESHMUKH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1897/2026 · 2026-07-22

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010253862026 2026:CGHC:31376-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1897 of 2026 Priya Deshmukh W/o Prashant Deshmukh, Aged About 36 Years Residing At New Aadarsh Nagar, Padhmanabhpur, District - Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Padhmanabhpur, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Aakriti Sharma, D/o Shri N.K. Sharma, Aged About 33 Years Residing At Street No. 05 (B) New Aadarsh Nagar, Padhmanabhpur, District Durg C.G. ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Himanshu Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.1 /State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 23.07.2026 1. Heard Mr. Himanshu Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the following prayers :- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 “i. First Information Report (FIR) bearing No. 286/2026 dated 13/08/2025 u/s 420, 467,468,read with 34 of Indian Penal Code 1860 registered at Police Station- Padhmanabhpur, District – Durg, Chhattisgarh.” 3. Learned State counsel pointed out that the petitioner is on anticipatory bail. It is further pointed out that this Court has already dismissed the petitions filed on behalf of co-accused in CRMP No. 1761/2026 and 1764/2026 and the petition filed on behalf of the present petitioner being CRMP No.1798/2026 and the present case is also similar to aforesaid petitions. 4. Considering the fact that this Court has already dismissed the petitions filed by the co-accused in CRMP No. 1761/2026 and 1764/2026 and the petition filed on behalf of the present petitioner being CRMP No.1798/2026 and the present case is also similar to aforesaid petitions, the present petition also stands dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra