1 APHC011019572017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7439/2017 Between: 1. VELUGU ESWARAMMA AND ANOTHER, W/O PAPI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, OCCU HOUSEWIFE, R/O PARNAPALLE ROAD, PULIVENDULA TOWN AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. VELUGU JAGAM MOHAN REDDY, S/O V. PAPI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCCU BUSINESS, R/O PARNAPALLE ROAD, PULIVENDULA TOWN AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. V SHOBA RANI, W/o H.K. Naga Raju, Aged about 48 years, Occu Housewife, Permanent R/o K. Velamavaripalli Village, Pulivendula Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh, Presently residing at Indira Nagar, Bangalore. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the Decree and Order passed in IA No.483 of 2017 in OS No.20 of 2010, dated 24.08.2017, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa IA NO: 1 OF 2017 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in OSNo.20 of 2010, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, pending disposal of the above C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. 4119/RAJANIKANTH JWALA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7439/2017 ORDER:- No representation on either side. 2. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 24.08.2017 in I.A.No.483 of 2017 in O.S.No.20 of 2010 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa. 2. At the time of admission, this Court directed interim orders in the main Civil Revision Petition. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Registry submitted case status report downloaded from the e-courts website document the relevant portion reads as under: “ The counsel for the plaintiff filed memo having the signature of the plaintiff seeking permission to not press the suit without costs. Having recorded the memo filed by the plaintiff, permission is accorded to not press the suit and accordingly, the suit is dismissed as not pressed without costs. I.A.No.281 of 2013 under Section 151 of C.P.C. As the main suit itself is dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner/plaintiff, this petition is infructuous. Hence it is closed.” 3. A plain reading of above para clearly reveals that main suit itself was not pressed. In nut shell, suit dismissed 4 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 13.03.2026 RMR/SSA 5 176 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7439/2017 13.03.2026 W RMR/SSA