IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-20848-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 SHAILANDER BANSAL ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. S.K. Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anuj Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel states that the claim of the petitioner be considered under Old Pension Scheme, for which reliance is placed on the judgment dated 17.10.2023 passed by a Coordinate Bench in CWP No.21305 of 2020 titled as ‘Anil Kumar Yadav Versus State of Haryana and Others.’ He thus submits that with regard to his claim, a representation dated 24.02.2026, Annexure P-10 is pending, which he prays may be decided in a time bound manner in light of the aforesaid judgment. 2. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to look into and decide the representation dated 24.02.2026, Annexure P-10, expeditiously and preferably within six months in accordance with law taking note of the aforesaid judgment, which this Court has no reason to believe the RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.13 18:21 I am the author of this document CWP-20848-2026 -2- authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 13, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.13 18:21 I am the author of this document