Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28661 (PNJ)

RAJINDER KUMAR HANS v. SARVA HARYANA GRAMIN BANK

CWP/11728/2026 · 2026-07-13

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP-11728-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 RAJINDER KUMAR HANS ... Petitioner VERSUS SARVA HARYANA GRAMIN BANK AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Ashish Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tejinder Kaur, Advocate for the respondents. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the instant petition to file a representation alongwith relevant documents before the Authority concerned with regard to the grievances that the petitioner has and submits that the same may be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned Senior Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into the abovesaid aspect expeditiously in accordance with law and decide the same within a period of 06 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.13 18:21 I am the author of this document CWP-11728-2026 -2- manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 13, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.13 18:21 I am the author of this document