APHC010944732018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Twelfth day of March, Two Thousand and Twenty Six The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No. Between: 1. M/S.Sree Ramanjaneya Traders, represented by its Managing Partner Vanukuri Sura Reddy, Chaparalavari Street, Patnam Bazar, Guntur. 1. Sri Samuel Anand Kumar, Agricultural and Marketing, Government of Andhra Pradesh, at Chuttugunta, Guntur City. Counsel for the petitioner 1. Penumaka Venkata Rao Counsel for the contemnor: 1. Sri Gangisetty Rajeshwara Rao Market Committee) representing Sri B.Prakasam. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Twelfth day of March, Two Thousand and Twenty Six Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No.3327 of 2018 Sree Ramanjaneya Traders, represented by its Managing Partner Vanukuri Sura Reddy, Chaparalavari Street, Patnam ...Petitioner and Sri Samuel Anand Kumar, I.A.S., Commissioner and Director of Agricultural and Marketing, Government of Andhra Pradesh, at Chuttugunta, Guntur City. ...Contemnor petitioner: Penumaka Venkata Rao Counsel for the contemnor: Sri Gangisetty Rajeshwara Rao (Standing Counsel for Agricultural Market Committee) representing Sri B.Prakasam. [3311] Thursday, the Twelfth day of March, Two Thousand and Twenty Six Sree Ramanjaneya Traders, represented by its Managing Partner Vanukuri Sura Reddy, Chaparalavari Street, Patnam Petitioner , Commissioner and Director of Agricultural and Marketing, Government of Andhra Pradesh, at Contemnor (Standing Counsel for Agricultural 2 BSB,J C.C.No.3327 of 2018 The Court made the following order: The contempt case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for willful violation of the order of this Court dated 30.08.2018 in I.A.No.01 of 2018 in W.P.No.31234 of 2018. 2. Sri N.S.Rupesh, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no order is required in this contempt case since the main writ petition was closed on 03.01.2022 and requested to close the contempt case. 3. Sri G.Rajeswara Rao, (Standing counsel for Agricultural Market Committee) representing the counsel for the contemnor / respondent submitted no objection to close the contempt case. 4. Hence, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated: 12.03.2026 GRL 3 BSB,J C.C.No.3327 of 2018 250 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No: 3327 of 2018 Dated: 12.03.2026 GRL 4 BSB,J C.C.No.3327 of 2018