APHC010842582017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2126/2017 Between: 1. SHAIK NANNI BEE, GUNTUR DIST., W/O LATE MASTANVALI, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI HELPER IN SEELAMVARIPALEM (ANJANEYA AGRAHARAM) CODE NO.219, WARD NO.21, BAPATLA MUNICIPALITY & TOWN, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DASARI SUKA JEEVANA KUMAR GUNTUR DIST ANOTHER, PROJECT DITECTORL, DISTRICT WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT D GEETHANJALI, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT, NEAR FIRE STATION OFFICE, BESIDES MUNICIPAL OFFICE, BAPATLA - 522101, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue notice to the contemnors/respondents directing them to appear before the Hon'ble Court personally and punish them under Section 10 & 12 of the contempt of Court Proceedings Act for their intentional, deliberate and willful disobedience and floating of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 21.09.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.39702 of 2015 in W.P.No.30737 of 2015, to meet the ends of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KISHORE KUMAR KATARI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 2 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP) The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of the orders dated 21.09.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.39702 of 2015 in W.P. No.30737 of 2015. 2. When the matter is called, Sri Katari Kishore Kumar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondents have complied with the interim orders granted by this Court. He submits that by virtue of the said interim orders, the petitioner joined in the service and presently she is discharging her duties as Anganwadi Worker. Hence, he submits that the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 09.03.2026 GVK 3 68 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.2126 of 2017 Date: 09.03.2026 GVK