Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28654 (AP)

B.KRISHNA MURTHY v. A.V. Ravi

CC/78/2018 · 2026-03-02

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC011012542017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 78/2018 Between: 1. B.KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE, KUPPAM P.A.C.S., KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. . ...PETITIONER AND 1. A V RAVI, President of Kuppam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., Kuppam Mandal, Kuppam, Chittoor District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish him under Sec 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful violation and disobedience of the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP No.30088 of 2017 dated 22-09-2017 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH RAVINDER Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. K SRINIVAS The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful violation and disobedience of the interim orders dated 22.09.2017, passed in W.P.No.30088 of 2017. 2 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. On the other side, Sri K. Sai Prakash, learned counsel representing Sri K. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the main writ petition, along with W.P.No.16363 of 2023, was disposed of in view of the payment made pursuant to the orders passed in W.P.No.30088 of 2017. Hence, he submits that no further orders are required in the present case. 4. Considering the submission made that the main writ petition was disposed of, recording that the payment was made to the petitioner, and also in view of the fact that there is no representation for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 03.03.2026 GVK 3 54 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.78 of 2018 Date: 03.03.2026 GVK