Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010134612023 NC: 2026:KHC:36399 WP No. 5897 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 5897 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
M/S. SNEHA WASH TECH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS, SRI. K.M.RAMAIAH, S/O. MUTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OFFICE AT NO.05 AND 12 GROUND FLOOR, CHUNCHAGATA MAIN ROAD, YELACHENAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 062. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MADHUKAR NADIG, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER, CANTONMENT BRANCH NO.21, ULSOOR ROAD, OPP. TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, BENGALURU-560 042. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRABHU RAO C.B., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010134612023 NC: 2026:KHC:36399 WP No. 5897 of 2023
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Madhukar Nadig., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Prabhu Rao C.B., counsel for the respondent appeared in person.
2. The petition is filed seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the possession notice dated:31.10.2023 issued by the respondent vide Annexure-C.
3. The petition is listed today under the caption for Preliminary Hearing - B Group along with the office note regarding non compliance of office objections i.e., Annexure-C is not forthcoming in the writ petition along with other office objections.
4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010134612023 NC: 2026:KHC:36399 WP No. 5897 of 2023
if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner may approach the appropriate forum, if so advised and if the law permits. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21.1